Pennsylvania Most Effective Basins Grants - 2023 Request for Proposals

Full Proposal Due Date: Thursday, April 27, 2023, by 11:59pm Eastern Time

Overview

The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), in partnership with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal-state Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) partnership, is soliciting proposals to restore water quality and habitats of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributary rivers and streams in Pennsylvania.

NFWF is soliciting proposals under the Pennsylvania Most Effective Basins (PA‐MEB) grants program for projects that accelerate volunteer implementation of cost-effective agricultural best management practices (“practices”) in selected basins of the Chesapeake Bay watershed of Pennsylvania. The intent of the PA-MEB program is to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in achieving its 2025 water quality goals for the agricultural sector under the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Pennsylvania’s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP). NFWF will award grants of up to $1,000,000 for projects that result in the direct implementation of eligible agricultural best management practices.

NFWF estimates awarding up to $5 million in grants through the PA-MEB program in 2023 contingent on the availability of funding. Major funding comes from the EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office.

Geographic Focus

All projects must occur wholly within selected basins of the Chesapeake Bay watershed in Pennsylvania, identified by EPA as most effective basins (MEB) based on the cost effectiveness of agricultural nitrogen load reduction practices in each basin to positively influence dissolved oxygen in the Bay. Details on EPA’s methodology for selecting MEBs can be found here and a map of eligible basins for agricultural nitrogen load reduction activities under the PA-MEB program can be found here.

Program Priorities

The primary purpose of the PA-MEB program is to maximize cost-effective reductions of agricultural nitrogen loads through the volunteer implementation of eligible agricultural conservation practices in Pennsylvania’s most effective basins, consistent with the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Pennsylvania’s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP). In addition, NFWF will prioritize funding for proposals that can yield rapid implementation outcomes related to planning, design and engineering, permitting, and construction of eligible practices and those that provide additional conservation and farm management co-benefits beyond water quality improvement.

Eligible Practices for Implementation, Technical Assistance, and Verification Activities

EPA and NFWF have identified the following eligible practices for the PA-MEB program, based on the demonstrated ability of these practices to yield relatively low-cost reductions in agricultural nitrogen loading. Notably, these eligible practices include both annual management practices that require ongoing implementation to yield creditable load reduction benefits in future years, as well as structural practices that, once implemented, generate multiple years of creditable load reductions based on their continued performance on the landscape.

  • Tillage Management
  • Tree Planting
  • Wetland Restoration
  • Prescribed Grazing
  • Animal Waste Management Systems
  • Manure Incorporation
  • Manure Injection
  • Manure Transport
  • Barnyard Runoff Control
  • Loafing Lot Management
  • Alternative Crops
  • Retirement of Highly Erodible Land
  • Cover Crops –Traditional
  • Cover Crops – Commodity
  • Forest and Grass Buffers
  • Forest and Grass Buffers with Stream Exclusion Fencing
  • Core Nutrient Management – Nitrogen
  • Supplemental Nutrient Management – N Rate
  • Supplemental Nutrient Management – N Placement
  • Supplemental Nutrient Management – N Timing
  • Soil and Water Conservation Plan

Additional information on each practice, including associated definitions and other common practice names, can be found in Appendix A. Further information on each practice, relevant qualifying conditions, and crediting methods is available through CBP’s “Quick Reference Guide for Best Management Practices” and established protocols approved by CBP’s BMP expert panels.

In addition to proposals seeking funding for direct practice implementation, NFWF and program partners are also soliciting proposals to provide for: (1) necessary technical assistance costs associated with conservation planning, and the design, engineering, and permitting of eligible practices that may be implemented at a later date or through other funding sources; and (2) piloting of innovative methods and approaches for verification of existing practices in support of ongoing crediting of existing practices for additional nitrogen reduction.

Priority #1 – Cost‐Effectiveness for Agricultural Nitrogen Load Reductions

For the purposes of the PA-MEB program, cost-effectiveness for agricultural nitrogen load reduction is defined as the total project funding request divided by the total nitrogen load reduction potential of the proposed practice(s) to be planned, implemented, and/or verified (i.e., $/lb N reduced). Total nitrogen load reduction potential further considers both the estimated annual nitrogen load reduction from the proposed practice(s), calculated in accordance with established methods approved by the CBP for crediting under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL, as well as the proposed timeframe for generating creditable load reduction benefits for proposed practice(s) in future years.

In determining proposed timeframe for generating creditable load reductions, NFWF will rely on both the default practice credit durations assigned by EPA and CBP, which specify the length of time specific practices generate creditable load reductions for TMDL purposes, as well as proposed approaches put forward by applicants to sustain implementation and performance of funded practices beyond these standard practice credit durations.

NFWF encourages applicants to actively seek and propose methods and approaches to sustain load reductions beyond standard practice credit durations through innovative approaches to practice verification. Selected examples include obtaining signed agreements with eligible landowners/operators to sustain implementation of annual practices (e.g., cover crops) for multiyear periods and/or maintain structural practices beyond their standard practice credit duration, or by incorporating new practice implementation and maintenance requirements with new or amended conservation or agricultural land preservation easements.

Any proposal seeking to obtain credit for load reductions beyond the standard practice credit must include associated conditions, roles, and responsibilities for contributed practice performance in the Operations, Maintenance, and Repair Plan attachment to Landowner-Grantee Agreements (see Appendix B).

To ensure consistency in estimating total load reduction potential across proposals and fairness in evaluating competing proposals, NFWF requires all applicants to utilize the FieldDoc platform to document proposed practices for implementation. FieldDoc will calculate estimated load reduction potential for each practice and for each overall proposal using established methods approved by the CBP for crediting under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL. NFWF will entertain Applicants seeking to use other CBP-approved tools or methods to calculate load reduction potential must contact NFWF in advance of proposal submission and obtain prior written approval from NFWF in order for associated proposals to be considered.

Priority #2 – Readiness to Proceed

Given approaching 2025 goals for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL, NFWF is seeking projects for the PA-MEB program that can move quickly to plan, implement, and verify eligible practices and associated load reduction benefits. Proposals solely seeking technical assistance funding will be evaluated based on commitment to future practice implementation, as evidence by documented commitment from other funding sources, as well as the anticipated schedule for future implementation.

Priority #3 – Conservation and Farm Management Co‐Benefits

While the PA-MEB program prioritizes cost-effective agricultural nitrogen load reductions consistent with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL and the water quality goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, NFWF and program partners are seeking proposals that can also benefit other goals and outcomes of the Watershed Agreement and NFWF’s Chesapeake Bay Business Plan, including improvements to stream and wetland habitats and associated benefits for Eastern brook trout and American black duck. Additional resources on the multiple benefits of nutrient and sediment best management practices, developed by CBP in support of Phase III WIP planning, can be found here.

In addition to co-benefits for regional ecosystem restoration efforts, NFWF is seeking proposals that deliver operational and/or financial benefits for eligible landowners/operators. Applicants will be asked to describe these benefits for proposed cooperating landowners/operators. Selected examples include reducing operating costs, simplifying or streamlining farm management processes, and increasing revenues from agricultural and non-agricultural products and services generated by cooperating landowners/operators.

Project Metrics

To better gauge progress on individual grants and to ensure greater consistency of project data provided by multiple grants, NFWF has provided a list of metrics in Easygrants for grantees to choose from for reporting. For the PA-MEB program, applicants and awardees will be required to report both project-level metrics via Easygrants and more detailed site and practice-level data via FieldDoc.org (see below for additional details).

The following is a complete list of applicable metrics. It is in the applicant’s best interest to be selective of the most relevant metrics that are well-aligned with the proposed project’s objectives and outcomes. If you do not believe an applicable metric has been provided, please contact Carley Morton at carley.morton@nfwf.org or (202) 857 0166, to discuss acceptable alternatives.

Applicable Metrics Metric Description/Instructions
CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Lbs N avoided (annually)*

Please use FieldDoc to develop estimates of the total nitrogen load reduction potential your proposed project. Enter FieldDoc‐generated pollutant load reduction totals in this field then upload your FieldDoc Project Summary in the "Uploads" section.
CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Acres with BMPs

Enter the total number of acres under agricultural or non‐urban BMPs to reduce nutrient or sediment loading. Do not double‐count individual acres which have multiple BMPs.
CBSF ‐ Riparian restoration ‐
Miles restored

Enter the number of miles of riparian habitat restored through the implementation of forest or grass buffers that are at least 35 feet wide. If you're implementing livestock exclusion, report associated outcomes instead under the "CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for livestock exclusion ‐‐ miles of fencing installed" metric. In the NOTES section, specify the landcover type prior to planting (barren, cropland, grassland, shrubland), the % of vegetation on the pre‐project site (0‐20%, 21‐40%, 41 60%, 61‐80%, 81‐100%), the dominant vegetation being planted (Broadleaf, Conifer, Shrub, Grass, Marsh, Swamp), the buffer width, and the acres.

CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Acres with cover crops

 Enter the number of cropland acres with cover crops practices. Please describe the cover crop practices in the NOTES section.

CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Acres with conservation tillage

 Enter the number of cropland acres with conservation tillage practices. Please describe conservation tillage practices in the NOTES section.

CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Acres with enhanced nutrient
management

 Enter the number of cropland acres with enhanced nutrient management practices other than or in addition to conservation tillage or cover crops. Please describe the nutrient management practices in the NOTES section.
CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ‐ Acres with managed grazing

Enter the number of acres with managed grazing (i.e., promoting plant growth above and below ground, improving wildlife habitat, and maximizing soil carbon through a variety of grazing approaches). Please describe the grazing practices in the NOTES section.

CBSF ‐ BMP implementation for livestock fencing ‐ Miles of fencing installed

 Enter the number of miles of livestock exclusion installed. Assume activities include exclusion fencing and a 35‐foot forest or grass buffer, unless otherwise noted.
CBSF ‐ Wetland restoration ‐
Acres restored

Enter the number of acres of wetland habitat restored, created, or enhanced. In the NOTES section, specify the landcover prior to restoration (Marsh, Tidal marsh, Wet meadow, Swamp) and indicate % of vegetation on pre‐project site (0‐20%, 21‐40%, 41‐ 60%, 61‐80%, 81‐100%).
CBSF ‐ Conservation easements ‐ Acres protected under easement

Enter the number of acres protected under long‐term easement (permanent or >30‐yr). Assuming the specific parcel(s) has been identified, in the NOTES indicate what % of natural land cover would have been cleared in the absence of the easement(s).
CBSF ‐ Land, wetland restoration ‐ Number of trees planted

Enter the number of trees planted for all non‐urban projects/practices. In the NOTES section, specify the specify the landcover type prior to planting (barren, cropland, grassland, shrubland), # of acres, and average # of trees per acre.

Eligibility

Eligible Applicants for the PA-MEB program are limited to conservation districts, technical service providers certified by the Pennsylvania office of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, countywide action planning coordinators identified through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s Phase III WIP planning process. Non-profit 501(c) organizations and local and municipal governments are also eligible but must demonstrate partnership and coordination with appropriate conservation districts, technical service providers, and/or countywide action planning coordinators by providing associated letters of support.

  • For‐profit applicants: Please note that this is a request for grant proposals, not a procurement of goods and services; see the Budget section below for specific cost considerations.

Eligible Landowners/Operators are limited to individuals and entities with ownership or management control of an agricultural operation, as defined by applicable Pennsylvania statutes, and located within identified most effective basins. Applicants must also complete signed Landowner-Grantee Agreements for all proposed landowners/operators prior to executing grant contracts with NFWF (see Appendix B). In addition, landowners/operators must be able to document compliance with all applicable agricultural erosion and sediment control, manure, and/or nutrient management plan requirements prior to project completion.

Questions about applicant and landowner/operator eligibility should be directed to NFWF prior to application.

Ineligible Uses of Grant Funds

  • Equipment: Applicants are encouraged to rent equipment where possible and costeffective or use matching funds to make those purchases. NFWF acknowledges, however, that some projects may only be completed using NFWF funds to procure equipment. If this applies to your project, please contact the NFWF program staff listed in this RFP (p. 9, Application Assistance) to discuss options.
  • Federal funds and matching contributions may not be used to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems (including entering or renewing a contract) that uses telecommunications equipment or services produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities) as a substantial or essential component, or as critical technology of any system. Refer to Public Law 115-232, section 889 for additional information.
  • NFWF funds and matching contributions may not be used to support political advocacy, fundraising, lobbying, litigation, terrorist activities or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations.
  • For the purposes of the PA-MEB program, operations under enforcement action by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, State Conservation Commission, or U.S. EPA are ineligible for program funding.

Funding Availability and Match 

NFWF will award up to $5 million in grants through the PA-MEB program in 2023 through awards of up to $1,000,000. Multiple proposals may be submitted that benefit a single landowner/operator, but each proposal will be evaluated independently. Similarly, proposals may be submitted that provide benefits for multiple landowner/operators. However, total technical assistance and implementation funding will be capped at $450,000 per landowner/operator. Given program priorities for rapid implementation outcomes, NFWF generally expects awarded projects to be completed within 18-24 months. All proposed projects must begin on or after September 1, 2023, to facilitate necessary grant contracting and quality assurance activities.

Match is encouraged but not required for the PA-MEB program. However, proposals that can effectively leverage multiple funding sources to support implementation will be viewed favorably. Applicants will be encouraged, but not required, to document leveraged federal, state, local, or private funding supporting implementation of proposed practices.

Evaluation Criteria 

All proposals will be screened for relevance, accuracy, completeness, and compliance with NFWF and funding source policies. Each proposal will then be evaluated based on the extent to which it meets the following criteria for the PA-MEB program. Underlined criteria are considered the primary evaluation criteria for the program.

Conservation Outcomes

  • Total Agricultural Nitrogen Load Reduction Potential: Proposal contributes meaningful agricultural nitrogen load reduction outcomes in support of the Chesapeake Bay TMDL, Pennsylvania’s Phase III WIP and, as applicable, associated Countywide Action Plans.
  • Conservation and Farm Management Co‐Benefits: Proposed implementation actions yield clear and meaningful co-benefits for regional ecosystem conservation and restoration goals and farm management outcomes.

Budget

  • Cost‐Effectiveness for Agricultural Nitrogen Load Reduction: Proposals that demonstrate the greatest cost-effectiveness for agricultural nitrogen load reductions (i.e., $/lb. N reduced) will generally be the most competitive proposals.
  • The quality and level of detail in the budget notes and budget narrative provide a clear and detailed understanding of the proposed funding request.
  • Proposed costs are reasonable based on the work plan, local or regional costs for similar activities, and commensurate with project outcomes.
  • If proposed work is partnership based, a clear indication of funding for project partners, stakeholders, and community members, is evident.
  • Proposed funding request is well leveraged by the partners and other contributors through cash-, in-kind, and other match.
  • The federal government has determined that a de minimis 10% indirect rate is an acceptable minimum for organizations without a NICRA. As such, NFWF reserves the right to scrutinize ALL proposals with indirect rates above 10% for cost-effectiveness.

Technical

  • Readiness: Considering the status of necessary planning, design, and permitting and proposed implementation timeline, projects demonstrate a readiness to rapidly proceed to practice implementation or verification.
  • Proposal provides specific goals that correlate with a clear, logical and achievable work plan, milestones, and timeline.
  • Proposed project team has the core competencies necessary to implement the proposed activities and achieve the proposed outcomes as well as the commitment to engage technical experts necessary to ensure activities are scientifically and technically sound and feasible.
  • Proposal demonstrates an understanding of necessary permitting and environmental compliance requirements and the ability to obtain necessary approvals consistent with the proposed work plan and timeline.
  • Applicant organization has demonstrated an ability to manage and implement similar projects on time and within budget.

Other

Quality Assurance – If a project involves monitoring, data collection or data use, grantees will be asked to prepare and submit quality assurance documentation. This includes any data collection activities described in the proposal as provided by match and partner activities. Examples of data collection or use which requires a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP):

  • New data collection.
  • Existing data use (a new use for data collected for a different purpose, whether by the same or different groups).
  • Data collection and analysis associated with development or design of plans and projects e.g. fish passage, watershed or water quality/habitat restoration project plans etc.
  • Water or other environmental monitoring.
  • Model development or use etc.
  • Citizen or community based scientific data collection, monitoring etc.

Applicants must budget time and resources in their CBSF proposal to complete this task. No data collection or use may begin until a QAPP is approved and on file. Reimbursement for project activities, including non-data collection activities, may be delayed until quality assurance compliance requirements are complete. Plan to submit the draft QAPP to NFWF within three months of award. The timeline for receiving review feedback and comments and subsequent submittal for EPA approval is dependent upon the quality of the draft QAPP submission and may involve several iterations. General assistance will be available to grantees to help with scoping and review of the draft QAPPs. For more information, follow the link to EPA QA and CBSF Quality Assurance Project Plan Guidance. Please contact Joe Toolan (joe.toolan@nfwf.org) if you have any questions about whether your project would require a QAPP. Applicants interested in details of NFWF’s quality assurance approach can visit our “Tools for Current Grantees” webpage for updated QAPP templates and recorded training and educational webinars.

Nutrient and Sediment Load Reductions – As noted above, NFWF requires all applicants to utilize the FieldDoc platform to document proposed practices for implementation. When setting up proposed projects in FieldDoc, please be sure to list your application’s 5-digit Easygrants number in the FieldDoc project title.

Upon grant award, NFWF will require all projects submitted under this solicitation to utilize FieldDoc for tracking and reporting of applicable water quality improvement activities during the course of their grant project. For technical support on FieldDoc utilization during the proposal development process, please contact the Commons at support@fielddoc.org. Further help documentation can be found on our website.

Practice Specifications – Unless otherwise noted, all conservation and restoration practices implemented through the PA-MEB program must conform to established and recognized standards and practices specifications (e.g., NRCS practice standards, state stormwater manuals and retrofit guidance, approved CBP BMP Expert Panel reports). Applicants must note where proposed practices will deviate from established standards and provide reasonable justification for why an alternative is necessary.

Applicant Demographic Information – In an effort to better understand diversity in our grantmaking, NFWF is collecting basic demographic information on applicants and their organizations via a voluntary survey form (available in Easygrants). This information will not be shared externally or with reviewers and will not be considered when making grant decisions. For more details, please see the tip sheet and the Uploads section of Easygrants.

Budget – Costs are allowable, reasonable and budgeted in accordance with NFWF’s Budget Instructions cost categories. Federally-funded projects must be in compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable.

Environmental Services – NFWF funds projects in pursuit of its mission to sustain, restore and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants and habitats for current and future generations. NFWF recognizes that some benefits from projects may be of value with regards to credits on an environmental services market (such as a carbon credit market). NFWF does not participate in, facilitate, or manage an environmental services market nor does NFWF assert any claim on such credits.

Intellectual Property – Intellectual property created using NFWF awards may be copyrighted or otherwise legally protected by award recipients. NFWF may reserve the right to use, publish, and copy materials created under awards, including posting such material on NFWF’s website and featuring it in publications. NFWF may use project metrics and spatial data from awards to estimate societal benefits that result and to report these results to funding partners. These may include but are not limited to: habitat and species response, species connectivity, water quality, water quantity, risk of detrimental events (e.g., wildfire, floods), carbon accounting (e.g., sequestration, avoided emissions), environmental justice, and diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Matching Contributions – Matching Contributions consist of cash, contributed goods and services, volunteer hours, and/or property raised and spent for the Project during the Period of Performance. Larger match ratios and matching fund contributions from a diversity of partners are encouraged and will be more competitive during application review.

Procurement – If the applicant chooses to specifically identify proposed Contractor(s) for Services, an award by NFWF to the applicant does not constitute NFWF’s express written authorization for the applicant to procure such specific services noncompetitively. When procuring goods and services, NFWF recipients must follow documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations.

Publicity and Acknowledgement of Support – Award recipients will be required to grant NFWF the right and authority to publicize the project and NFWF’s financial support for the grant in press releases, publications and other public communications. Recipients may also be asked by NFWF to provide high-resolution (minimum 300 dpi) photographs depicting the project.

Receiving Award Funds – Award payments are primarily reimbursable. Projects may request funds for reimbursement at any time after completing a signed agreement with NFWF. A request of an advance of funds must be due to an imminent need of expenditure and must detail how the funds will be used and provide justification and a timeline for expected disbursement of these funds.

Compliance Requirements – Projects selected may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act (state and federal), and National Historic Preservation Act. Documentation of compliance with these regulations must be approved prior to initiating activities that disturb or alter habitat or other features of the project site(s). Applicants should budget time and resources to obtain the needed approvals. As may be applicable, successful applicants may be required to comply with additional Federal, state or local requirements and obtain all necessary permits and clearances.

Permits – Successful applicants will be required to provide sufficient documentation that the project expects to receive or has received all necessary permits and clearances to comply with any Federal, state or local requirements. Where projects involve work in the waters of the United States, NFWF strongly encourages applicants to conduct a permit pre-application meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers prior to submitting their proposal. In some cases, if a permit pre-application meeting has not been completed, NFWF may require successful applicants to complete such a meeting prior to grant award.

Federal Funding – The availability of federal funds estimated in this solicitation is contingent upon the federal appropriations process. Funding decisions will be made based on level of funding and timing of when it is received by NFWF.

Timeline

Dates of activities are subject to change and contingent on the availability of funding. Please check the Program page of the NFWF website for the most current dates and information (http://www.nfwf.org/chesapeake).

Applicant Webinar (View Recording)      Monday, February 27th, 2:00pm Eastern Time

FieldDoc Webinar (View Recording)      Thursday March 9th, 1:00p, Eastern Time

Proposal Due Date                           Thursday, April 27th, 11:59pm Eastern Time

Proposal Review Period                   August

Awards Announced                          September (anticipated)

How to Apply

All application materials must be submitted online through NFWF’s Easygrants system.

  1. Go to easygrants.nfwf.org to register in our Easygrants online system. New users to the system will be prompted to register before starting the application (if you already are a registered user, use your existing login). Enter your applicant information. Please disable the pop-up blocker on your internet browser prior to beginning the application process.
  2. Once on your homepage, click the “Apply for Funding” button and select this RFP’s “Funding Opportunity” from the list of options.
  3. Follow the instructions in Easygrants to complete your application. Once an application has been started, it may be saved and returned to at a later time for completion and submission.

Application Assistance

A Tip Sheet is available for quick reference while you are working through your application. This document can be downloaded at http://www.nfwf.org/chesapeake. Additional information to support the application process can be accessed on the NFWF website’s Applicant Information page.

For more information or questions about this RFP, please contact Jake Reilly (jake.reilly@nfwf.org), Joe Toolan (joe.toolan@nfwf.org), or Carley Morton (carley.morton@nfwf.org) via e-mail.

For issues or assistance with our online Easygrants system, please contact:

Easygrants Helpdesk
Email: Easygrants@nfwf.org
Voicemail: 202-595-2497
Hours: 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday.
Include: Your name, proposal ID #, e-mail address, phone number, program to which you are applying, and a description of the issue.

NFWF also offers on-demand, field-based project and partnership development support through field liaisons, providing broad geographic coverage across the Bay region for agricultural conservation, urban stormwater management, wetland and watershed science, and habitat experience and expertise relevant to Bay restoration goals. Applicants may also contact these field liaisons using the information below to discuss potential projects

Field Liaison Contact Email  Phone Sector Expertise

Kristen Saacke Blunk

 kristen@headwaters-llc.org (814) 360-9766 All Sectors

Kristen Hughes Evans

 kristen@sustainablechesapeake.org (804) 554-3403 Agricultural Conservation

Liz Feinberg

 liz.feinberg63@gmail.com (610) 212-2345 All Sectors

Katie Ombalski

 katie@woodswaters.com (814) 574-7281 Agricultural Conservation; Habitat Restoration